This article was medically authored by Dr. Eric Hardee and was last reviewed for accuracy on 11/09/2026.
There are several options to explore for the treatment of uterine fibroids. For years, doctors told women suffering from fibroid symptoms that their only option for relief was a hysterectomy (surgical removal of the uterus.) However, there are less invasive treatment options, including surgical removal of individual tumors (myomectomy) and a procedure that shrinks tumors by reducing their blood supply (UFE, or Uterine Fibroid Embolization.)
When comparing UFE vs Myomectomy as potential treatment options, there are many factors to consider, including safety, efficacy, cost and recovery time. In this post, we highlight the pros and cons of each option, to help you make the best treatment choice for your needs.
Key Takeaways

Minimally invasive UFE shrinks fibroids by cutting off blood flow to the tumors. During this procedure, an interventional radiologist accesses the uterine artery via catheter, using a small access point. Then, guided by ultrasound, embolic material is deposited, reducing blood flow to the fibroids and causing them to shrink gradually in the weeks and months following the procedure.
In contrast, a myomectomy surgically removes individual tumors. There are three different types of myomectomy surgery:
Because tumors are removed with all of these myomectomy approaches, symptom improvement may become apparent earlier than with UFE. However, because the procedure is surgical, it comes with more risks for complications, especially if performed as an open surgery, according to new research. Additionally, when myomectomy requires general anesthesia as well as overnight hospital stays, this treatment option can become more costly than UFE.
Both procedures are generally considered safe. However, because myomectomy often requires general anesthesia and larger incisions, the risk for associated complications may be higher. Still, some women with large or multiple tumors may be better served by myomectomy than UFE. We can help determine your UFE candidacy with this short and easy quiz.
Recent studies show that less invasive Uterine Fibroid Embolization is equally as effective as myomectomy surgery for fibroid relief! Specifically, the FEMME study spent 7 years following 950 women with fibroids. Half the study participants underwent the UFE procedure, and half chose myomectomy for treatment of uterine fibroids. Here's what they learned: both procedures effectively reduced symptoms such as heavy bleeding in almost equal measure. And, when it came to follow up treatments, 9.9% of women who had myomectomy needed further treatment, while that was only true for 8.6% of women in the UFE group. Plus, 2.9% of women who chose myomectomy experienced post-procedural complications, versus only 1.1% of women who underwent UFE. As such, lead researcher Dr. Jemianne Bautista-Jia concluded, "The two treatments were comparably effective [and] UFE resulted in more favorable outcomes."
Now, that was not just true for early follow ups. 36 months after their procedures, women who chose myomectomy saw a greater decrease in the size of their largest tumor. However, the women who underwent UFE experienced greater reductions in the size of their enlarged uterus.
Even better news for UFE patients? 29% of myomectomy patients needed a follow-up procedure for the treatment of uterine fibroids, compared to just 24% of women who chose UFE treatment. Plus, twelve of the women who chose UFE reported on their healthy pregnancies, compared to just six women who selected myomectomy.
Clearly, there is a lot to think about when choosing between UFE vs myomectomy to treat your fibroids. At Texas Endovascular, our team is here to help you make your best and most informed decision. To learn more, we invite you to request a consultation at one of our eight locations in the greater Dallas and Houston metro areas.